The safety of deferred coronary angiography in COVID-19 patients with acute coronary syndrome: the Barts COVID recovered pathway.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel pathway of deferrred invasive angiography in low-risk NSTEMI patients with concurrent COVID-19 infections; contrary to current UK guidelines recommending invasive coronary angiography in NSTEMI patients within 72 hours. METHODS: This was a single-centre, observational study of all NSTEMI patients referred for inpatient coronary angiography at Barts Heart Centre, between March 2020 and June 2022. Demographic, procedural and outcome data were collected as part of a national cardiac audit. RESULTS: 201 COVID positive NSTEMI patients were referred for angiography at Barts Heart Centre. 10 patients died from COVID related respiratory complications prior to angiography. Therefore, 191 patients underwent deferred angiography (median time 16 days from COVID diagnosis). The median GRACE score was 128 (IQR 86-153). Troponin levels were significantly elevated on initial COVID diagnosis compared to time of their procedure. 73% patients had a culprit lesion identified. 61.2% receiving PCI. Patients were followed-up for a median of 363 days (IQR 120-485 days) with MACE rates of 7.3%. This is comparable to the MACE event for NSTEMI patients (n=4529) without COVID at our institution treated during the same time-period (8.1%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of deferred coronary angiography on a COVID-Recovered pathway after a period of medical management for patients presenting with NSTEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection. There was no adverse signal associated with the wait for angiography with similar MACE rates to the non-deferred NSTEMI cohort without COVID-19.

Thrombus Burden and Outcomes in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting With STEMI Across the Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: It has been previously reported during the first COVID-19 outbreak that patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and concurrent COVID-19 infection have increased thrombus burden and poorer outcomes. To date, there have been no reports comparing the outcomes of COVID-19-positive STEMI patients across all waves of the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the baseline demographic, procedural, and angiographic characteristics alongside the clinical outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection across the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational study of 1,269 consecutive patients admitted with confirmed STEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (between January 3, 2020 and October 3, 2022). COVID-19-positive patients were split into 3 groups based upon the time course of the pandemic, and a comparison was made between waves. RESULTS: A total of 154 COVID-19-positive patients with STEMI were included in the present analysis and were compared with 1,115 COVID-19-negative patients. Early during the pandemic (wave 1), STEMI patients presenting with concurrent COVID-19 infection had high rates of cardiac arrest, evidence of increased thrombus burden, bigger infarcts, and worse outcomes. However, by wave 3, no differences existed in outcomes between COVID-19-positive and -negative patients, with significant differences compared with earlier COVID-19-positive patients. Poor outcomes later in the study period were predominantly in unvaccinated individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics, angiographic features, and outcomes of STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention during the course of the pandemic. Importantly, outcomes of recent waves and in vaccinated individuals are no different to a non-COVID-19 population.

An exploration of the early discharge approach for low-risk STEMI patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Recently, there has been growing interest in the early discharge strategy for low-risk patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). So far findings have suggested there are multiple advantages of shorter hospital stays, including that it could be a safe way to be more cost- and resource-efficient, reduce cases of hospital-acquired infection and boost patient satisfaction. However, there are remaining concerns surrounding safety, patient education, adequate follow-up and the generalisability of the findings from current studies which are mostly small-scale. By assessing the current research, we describe the advantages, disadvantages and challenges of early hospital discharge for STEMI and discuss the factors that determine if a patient can be considered low risk. If it is feasible to safely employ a strategy like this, the implications for healthcare systems worldwide could be extremely beneficial, particularly in lower-income economies and when we consider the detrimental impacts of the recent COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare systems.

An observational study assessing the use of Sirolimus-eluting balloons for side-branch treatment in the provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations.

Background: Drug eluting balloons (DEB) are a feasible method of rapid delivery of drug to a coronary vessel wall. Their efficacy has been established for the treatment of in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease but there is limited data for their use in bifurcation lesions. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of provisional upfront side-branch DEB use in bifurcation lesions compared to a simple balloon (POBA) or upfront 2 stent bifurcation strategy. Methods: We conducted an observational study of 625 patients undergoing PCI to bifurcation lesions. All the patients had a DES deployed in the main vessel (MV). Decision on revascularization option for the side branch (SB) was made by the operator. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure. Secondary endpoints were target vessel myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality. Results: 311 patients had upfront DEB to the SB whilst the remaining were treated with either DES (188) or POBA (126). Baseline characteristics were similar aside from history of previous MI, which were higher in patients treated with DES or POBA, p = 0.009 whereas patients with previous CABG were likely to undergo DEB treatment (p = 0.004). TVF was more likely to occur in the POBA group (7.5 %) compared to the DEB (3.3 %) and DES (3.3 %) groups (p = 0.0019). There was no significant difference in TV-MI (p = 0.62) or death (p = 0.98) between the groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that provisional bifurcation stenting with upfront Sirolimus DEB use in the SB is an effective treatment for non-LMS bifurcation PCI.

Acute Myocarditis Associated With Desmosomal Gene Variants.

BACKGROUND: The risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocarditis (AM) and desmosomal gene variants (DGV) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to ascertain the risk of death, ventricular arrhythmias, recurrent myocarditis, and heart failure (main endpoint) in patients with AM and pathogenic or likely pathogenetic DGV. METHODS: In a retrospective international study from 23 hospitals, 97 patients were included: 36 with AM and DGV (DGV[+]), 25 with AM and negative gene testing (DGV[-]), and 36 with AM without genetics testing. All patients had troponin elevation plus findings consistent with AM on histology or at cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). In 86 patients, CMR changes in function and structure were re-assessed at follow-up. RESULTS: In the DGV(+) AM group (88.9% DSP variants), median age was 24 years, 91.7% presented with chest pain, and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 56% on CMR (P = NS vs the other 2 groups). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a higher risk of the main endpoint in DGV(+) AM compared with DGV(-) and without genetics testing patients (62.3% vs 17.5% vs 5.3% at 5 years, respectively; P < 0.0001), driven by myocarditis recurrence and ventricular arrhythmias. At follow-up CMR, a higher number of late gadolinium enhanced segments was found in DGV(+) AM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AM and evidence of DGV have a higher incidence of adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients with AM without DGV. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain if genetic testing might improve risk stratification of patients with AM who are considered at low risk.

Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Emergency Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Emergency percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main (LM ePCI) coronary artery necessitated by acute coronary syndrome is associated with a high risk of mortality. However, optimal treatment strategies and related outcomes remain undefined in this group. We undertook a multi-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of consecutive patients requiring LM ePCI between 2011 and 2018 and reported the coronary anatomy, treatment strategies, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. A total of 116 consecutive cases were included. Patients were predominantly male (85%) with a median age of 68.0 years; 12 patients (10%) had previous coronary artery bypass grafting. ST-elevation was noted in 76 (66%); 30 (26%) presented with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) and 47 (41%) with cardiogenic shock. The most frequent pattern of disease was Medina 1,1,1, seen in 59 patients (51%). The commonest revascularization strategy was provisional stenting (95 cases, 82%) with improved or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow seen in 85 cases (73%). All-cause mortality was 35% at 30 days, rising to 58% at 5 years. Adverse predictors of 30-day mortality included presentation with cardiogenic shock (p = 0.018) and OOHCA (p = 0.020), whereas improved flow and/or thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow in both circumflex and left anterior descending artery afforded a better prognosis (p = 0.028). In conclusion, patients who underwent LM ePCI are a high-risk subgroup and commonly present with cardiogenic shock and OOHCA. Provisional stenting appears to be the preferred option with the successful restoration of coronary flow in most cases despite complex anatomy. High 30-day mortality is driven by the presence of cardiogenic shock, OOHCA, and failure to restore or improve coronary flow.

An Observational Study Assessing the Predictors of Procedural Failure From the Radial Approach: Is Right Radial Access Always the Best?

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the predictors of procedural failure (coronary cannulation) in patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from the transradial (TR) approach. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 20,315 consecutive patients undergoing TR angiography between 2016 and 2020. TR failure was described as inability to cannulate the coronary arteries. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TR failure. RESULTS: Out of the study population, TR failure was observed in 365 (1.8%) patients, out of which 281 (77%) crossed over successfully to the transfemoral (TF) route and 84 (23%) to left radial access (LRA). Unsuccessful procedures were most likely seen in patients who were elderly, female, BAME background, short stature or with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and renal disease. On regression analysis, age (OR: 1.024; 95% Cl: 1.014-1.035), female gender (OR: 0.729; 95% Cl: 0.555-0.957), BAME (OR: 0.786; 95% Cl: 0.612-0.959), height (OR: 0.988; 95% Cl: 0.977-0.999), hypertension (OR: 1.510; 95% Cl: 1.147-1.987) and RRA (OR: 1.977; 95% Cl: 1.105-3.538) were independent predictors of TR failure. On further analysis, these predictors of failure were not seen from the LRA approach. CONCLUSION: This study identifies that rates of TR failure are low and that predictors of failure differ between the RRA and LRA. The difference in predictors between the 2 routes suggests that in patients when coronary cannulation is unsuccessful via the RRA then the LRA could be considered as a second access site. Further study is needed to see if in selected patient groups the LRA could be used as the first-choice access route.

Early Hospital Discharge Following PCI for Patients With STEMI.

BACKGROUND: Regional heart attack services have improved clinical outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by facilitating early reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Early discharge after primary PCI is welcomed by patients and increases efficiency of health care. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of a novel early hospital discharge pathway for low-risk STEMI patients. METHODS: Between March 2020 and June 2021, 600 patients who were deemed at low risk for early major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were selected for inclusion in the pathway and were successfully discharged in <48 hours. Patients were reviewed by a structured telephone follow-up at 48 hours after discharge by a cardiac rehabilitation nurse and underwent a virtual follow-up at 2, 6, and 8 weeks and at 3 months. RESULTS: The median length of hospital stay was 24.6 hours (interquartile range [IQR]: 22.7-30.0 hours) (prepathway median: 65.9 hours [IQR: 48.1-120.2 hours]). After discharge, all patients were contacted, with none lost to follow-up. During median follow-up of 271 days (IQR: 88-318 days), there were 2 deaths (0.33%), both caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (>30 days after discharge), with 0% cardiovascular mortality and MACE rates of 1.2%. This finding compared favorably with a historical group of 700 patients meeting pathway criteria who remained in the hospital for >48 hours (>48-hour control group) (mortality, 0.7%; MACE, 1.9%) both in unadjusted and propensity-matched analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Selected low-risk patients can be discharged safely following successful primary PCI by using a pathway that is supported by a structured, multidisciplinary virtual follow-up schedule.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in STEMI.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical environment has been forced to adapt to meet the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive care facilities were expanded in anticipation of the pandemic where the consequences include severe delays in elective procedures. Emergent procedures such as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in which delays in timely delivery have well established adverse prognostic effects must also be explored in the context of changes in procedure and public behaviour associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim for this single centre retrospective cohort study is to determine if door-to-balloon (D2B) times in PCI for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) during the United Kingdom's first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic differed from pre-COVID-19 populations. METHODS: Data was extracted from our single centre PCI database for all patients that underwent pPCI for STEMI. The reference (Pre-COVID-19) cohort was collected over the period 01-03-2019 to 31-05-2019 and the exposure group (COVID-19) over the period 01-03-2020 to 31-05-2020. Baseline patient characteristics for both populations were extracted. The primary outcome measurement was D2B times. Secondary outcome measurements included: time of symptom onset to call for help, transfer time to first hospital, transfer time from non-PCI to PCI centre, time from call-to-help to PCI centre, time to table and onset of symptoms to balloon time. Categorical and continuous variables were assessed with Chi squared and Mann-Whitney U analysis respectively. Procedural times were calculated and compared in the context of heterogeneity findings. RESULTS: 4 baseline patient characteristics were unbalanced between populations with statistical significance (P<0.05). The pre-covid-19 cohort was more likely to have suffered out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and had left circumflex disease, whereas the 1st wave cohort were more likely to have been investigated with left ventriculography and be of Afro-Caribbean origin. No statistically significant difference in in-hospital procedural times was found with D2B, C2B, O2B times comparable between groups. Pre-hospital delays were the greatest contributors in missed target times: the 1st wave group had significantly longer delayed time of symptom onset to call for help (Control: 31 mins; IQR [82.5] vs 1st wave: 60 mins; IQR [90.0], P=0.001) and time taken from call for help to arrival at the PCI hospital (control: 72 mins; IQR [23] vs 1st wave: 80 mins; IQR [66.5], P=0.042). CONCLUSION: Enhanced infection prevention and control procedures considering the COVID-19 pandemic did not impede the delivery of pPCI in our single centre cohort. The public health impact of the pandemic has been demonstrated with times being significantly impacted by patient related delays. The recovery of public engagement in emergency medical services must become the focus for public health initiatives as we emerge from the height of COVID-19 disease burden in the UK.

Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?

Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.

Acute myocarditis: aetiology, diagnosis and management.

Acute myocarditis is a serious, likely underdiagnosed condition affecting people of all ages and for which the number of UK hospital admissions is rising. A primary diagnosis of myocarditis accounted for 0.04% (36.5 per 100,000) of all hospital admissions in England between 1998 and 2017, although this is likely to be an underestimate of the true burden of myocarditis. The aetiology is broad, including infective and inflammatory conditions as well as exposure to toxic agents. Clinical features are varied and overlap with other acute cardiac conditions making diagnosis a challenge. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging currently serves as the gold standard non-invasive diagnostic modality. If an underlying aetiological process is identified, then therapy may be directed at the cause; however, for most, treatment is supportive and aimed at managing any complications such as heart failure or arrhythmias. There is emerging evidence for immunosuppressive therapy in certain cases. Prognosis is generally good with recovery in most; however, up to 30% with biopsy-proven myocarditis progress to develop a dilated cardiomyopathy and its potential associated complications. All-cause mortality in the UK for patients presenting to hospital with acute myocarditis is approximately 4%.

Reintroduction of elective cardiac interventions in the era of COVID-19: the Barts experience.

BACKGROUND: The response to COVID-19 has required cancellation of all but the most urgent procedures; there is therefore a need for the reintroduction of a safe elective pathway. METHODS: This was a study of a pilot pathway performed at Barts Heart Centre for the admission of patients requiring elective coronary and structural procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic (April-June 2020). All patients on coronary and structural waiting lists were screened for procedural indications, urgency and adverse features for COVID-19 prognosis and discussed at dedicated multidisciplinary teams. Dedicated admission pathways involving preadmission isolation, additional consent, COVID-19 PCR testing and dedicated clean areas were used. RESULTS: 143 patients (101 coronary and 42 structural) underwent procedures (coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, transcatheter aortic valve intervention and MitralClip) during the study period. The average age was 68.2; 74% were male; and over 93% had one or more moderate COVID-19 risk factors. All patients were COVID-19 PCR negative on admission with (8.1%) COVID-19 antibody positive (swab negative). All procedures were performed successfully with low rates of procedural complications (9.8%). At 2-week follow-up, no patients had symptoms or confirmed COVID-19 infection with significant improvements in quality if life and symptoms. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that patients undergoing coronary and structural procedures can be safely admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no patients contracting COVID-19 during their admission. Reassuringly, patients reflective of typical practice, that is, those at moderate or higher risk, were treated successfully. This pilot provides important information applicable to other settings, specialties and areas to reintroduce services safely.

COVID-19 and changes in activity and treatment of ST elevation MI from a UK cardiac centre.

BACKGROUND: The international healthcare response to COVID-19 has been driven by epidemiological data related to case numbers and case fatality rate. Second order effects have been less well studied. This study aimed to characterise the changes in emergency activity of a high-volume cardiac catheterisation centre and to cautiously model any excess indirect morbidity and mortality. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome fulfilling criteria for the heart attack centre (HAC) pathway at St. Bartholomew's hospital, UK. Electronic data were collected for the study period March 16th - May 16th 2020 inclusive and stored on a dedicated research server. Standard governance procedures were observed in line with the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society audit. RESULTS: There was a 28% fall in the number of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the study period (111 vs. 154) and 36% fewer activations of the HAC pathway (312 vs. 485), compared to the same time period averaged across three preceding years. In the context of 'missing STEMIs', the excess harm attributable to COVID-19 could result in an absolute increase of 1.3% in mortality, 1.9% in nonfatal MI and 4.5% in recurrent ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The emergency activity of a high-volume PCI centre was significantly reduced for STEMI during the peak of the first wave of COVID-19. Our data can be used as an exemplar to help future modelling within cardiovascular workstreams to refine aggregate estimates of the impact of COVID-19 and inform targeted policy action.

Validation of the CREST score for predicting circulatory-aetiology death in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without STEMI.

AIMS: The CREST tool was recently developed to stratify the risk of circulatory-aetiology death (CED) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to validate the CREST score using an external cohort and determine whether it could be improved by the addition of serum lactate on admission. METHODS: The study involved the retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to a single tertiary centre with OHCA of presumed cardiac origin over a 51-month period. The CREST score was calculated by attributing points to the following variables: Coronary artery disease (CAD), non-shockable Rhythm, Ejection fraction <30%, cardiogenic Shock at presentation and ischaemic Time ≥25 minutes. The primary endpoint was CED vs neurological aetiology death (NED) or survival. RESULTS: Of 500 patients admitted with OHCA, 211 did not meet criteria for STEMI and were included. 115 patients died in hospital (71 NED, 44 CED). When analysed individually, CED was associated with all CREST variables other than a previous diagnosis of CAD. The CREST score accurately predicted CED with excellent discrimination (C-statistic 0.880, 95% CI 0.813-0.946) and calibration (Hosmer and Lemeshow P=0.948). Although an admission lactate ≥7 mmol/L also predicted CED, its addition to the CREST score (the C-AREST score) did not significantly improve the predictive ability (CS 0.885, 0.815-0.954, HS P=0.942, X2 difference in -2 log likelihood =0.326, P=0.850). CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to independently validate the CREST score for predicting CED in patients presenting with OHCA without STEMI. Addition of lactate on admission did not improve its predictive ability.

The use of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists (warfarin) in patients with left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction.

AIM: Current guidelines recommend the use of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for up to 3-6 months for treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, based on evidence supporting non-inferiority of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared to VKA for other indications such as deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation, NOACs are being increasingly used off licence for the treatment of LV thrombus post-AMI. In this study, we investigated the safety and effect of NOACs compared to VKA on LV thrombus resolution in patients presenting with AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was an observational study of 2328 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI between May 2015 and December 2018, at a UK cardiac centre. Patients' details were collected from the hospital electronic database. The primary endpoint was rate of LV thrombus resolution with bleeding rates a secondary outcome. Left ventricular thrombus was diagnosed in 101 (4.3%) patients. Sixty patients (59.4%) were started on VKA and 41 patients (40.6%) on NOAC therapy (rivaroxaban: 58.5%, apixaban: 36.5%, and edoxaban: 5.0%). Both groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics including age, previous cardiac history (previous myocardial infarction, PCI, coronary artery bypass grafting), and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia). Over the follow-up period (median 2.2 years), overall rates of LV thrombus resolution were 86.1%. There was greater and earlier LV thrombus resolution in the NOAC group compared to patients treated with warfarin (82% vs. 64.4%, P = 0.0018, at 1 year), which persisted after adjusting for baseline variables (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.9). Major bleeding events during the follow-up period were lower in the NOAC group, compared with VKA group (0% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.030) with no difference in rates of systemic thromboembolism (5% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.388). CONCLUSION: These data suggest improved thrombus resolution in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) LV thrombosis in patients treated with NOACs compared to VKAs. This improvement in thrombus resolution was accompanied with a better safety profile for NOAC patients vs. VKA-treated patients. Thus, provides data to support a randomized trial to answer this question.

An observational study assessing the impact of a cardiac arrest centre on patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major cause of death worldwide. Recent guidelines recommend the centralisation of OHCA services in cardiac arrest centres to improve outcomes. In 2015, two major tertiary cardiac centres in London merged to form a large dedicated tertiary cardiac centre. This study aimed to compare the short-term mortality of patients admitted with an OHCA before-and-after the merger of services had taken place and admission criteria were relaxed, which led to managing OHCA in higher volume. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data of OHCA patients pre- and post-merger. Baseline demographic and medical characteristics were recorded, along with factors relating to the cardiac arrest. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: OHCA patients (N =728; 267 pre- and 461 post-merger) between 2013 and 2018 were analysed. Patients admitted pre-merger were older (65.0 vs. 62.4 years, p=0.027), otherwise there were similar baseline demographic and peri-arrest characteristics. There was a greater proportion of non-acute coronary syndrome-related OHCA admission post-merger (10.1% vs. 23.4%, p=0.0001) and a corresponding decrease in those admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (80.2% vs. 57.0%, p=0.0001) and those treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (78.8% vs. 54.0%, p=0.0001). Despite this, in-hospital mortality was lower post-merger (63.7% vs. 44.3%, p=0.0001), which persisted after adjustment for demographic and arrest-related characteristics using stepwise logistic regression (p=0.036) between the groups. CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in non-acute coronary syndrome-related OHCA cases, the formation of a centralised invasive heart centre was associated with improved survival in OHCA patients. This suggests there may be a benefit of a cardiac arrest centre model of care.

The Safety and Feasibility of Transitioning From Transfemoral to Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (LVEMB) is commonly performed via the transfemoral route. Radial access may help reduce vascular access complications, but there are few data on the safety and feasibility of transradial LVEMB. OBJECTIVE: Describe the safety and feasibility of transitioning from transfemoral to transradial access LVEMB. METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. Fifty procedures in 49 patients were included, 25 (50%) via the femoral route and 25 (50%) via the radial route. RESULTS: The cohort had a mean age of 47 ± 13 years and the most common indication for LVEMB was myocarditis. From June 2015 until September 2016, all procedures (n = 21) were performed via the femoral approach; thenceforth, there was a gradual transition to the radial approach. More tissue samples were obtained when the procedure was performed via the femoral approach (P<.01). The minimum sampling target of 3 specimens was not met in 4 patients (16%) via the radial approach and in 1 patient (4%) via the femoral approach. Complications occurred in 3/25 transradial procedures (12%; 2 cardiac perforations and 1 forearm hematoma) and 3/25 transfemoral procedures (12%; 1 cardiac perforation, 1 femoral artery pseudoaneurysm, and 1 ventricular fibrillation). Cardiac perforations via the transradial approach occurred during the early transition period. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Transradial LVEMB is feasible, with a similar complication profile to femoral procedures, but associated with a smaller number of specimens. Transitioning from transfemoral to transradial procedures may initially be associated with a higher risk of complications and potentially a lower diagnostic yield.

High Thrombus Burden in Patients With COVID-19 Presenting With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is thought to predispose patients to thrombotic disease. To date there are few reports of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by type 1 myocardial infarction in patients with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the demographic, angiographic, and procedural characteristics alongside clinical outcomes of consecutive cases of COVID-19-positive patients with STEMI compared with COVID-19-negative patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, observational study of 115 consecutive patients admitted with confirmed STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention at Barts Heart Centre between March 1, 2020, and May 20, 2020. RESULTS: Patients with STEMI presenting with concurrent COVID-19 infection had higher levels of troponin T and lower lymphocyte count, but elevated D-dimer and C-reactive protein. There were significantly higher rates of multivessel thrombosis, stent thrombosis, higher modified thrombus grade post first device with consequently higher use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and thrombus aspiration. Myocardial blush grade and left ventricular function were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 with STEMI. Higher doses of heparin to achieve therapeutic activated clotting times were also noted. Importantly, patients with STEMI presenting with COVID-19 infection had a longer in-patient admission and higher rates of intensive care admission. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with STEMI and concurrent COVID-19 infection, there is a strong signal toward higher thrombus burden and poorer outcomes. This supports the need for establishing COVID-19 status in all STEMI cases. Further work is required to understand the mechanism of increased thrombosis and the benefit of aggressive antithrombotic therapy in selected cases.